微星Claw 8 AI+评测--得益于英特尔Lunar Lake技术的最佳游戏掌上电脑？巨大进步。 微星新推出的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商首款游戏掌机的重大改进。此外，它还配备了英特尔更高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、刷新率达 120Hz 的更大 8 英寸显示屏和 VRR，以及 80 瓦时的大电池。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/07/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇳🇱 🇮🇹 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 AI Arc Handheld Gaming Laptop / Notebook Lunar Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows
结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一，但也非常昂贵微星对其第二代游戏掌上电脑进行了大规模改进，但在原版表现如此糟糕的情况下，这是很有必要的。其低效的流星湖处理器尤其是个问题。不过，由于采用了新的 Claw 8 AI+ 的 Lunar Lake 芯片，这款机型的表现要好得多。这意味着更好的游戏性能（与 ROG Ally X相比）、更低的能耗和更长的运行时间。它的风扇也变得更安静了，但微星真的应该看看它们在持续负载下的波动速度。
Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
在连接性方面，该设备的第二个 USB-C 端口非常受欢迎，其更大的 IPS 屏幕也令人印象深刻，刷新率高达 120 赫兹，并具有 VRR 功能，但其响应时间略逊于前代机型。 前代机型。
微星软件整体运行良好，但有时会有些卡顿，而且其功能范围赶不上华硕的同类产品。这款掌上电脑的能耗曲线也有点尴尬，因为它的人工智能引擎只能提供降低的性能。考虑到它的性能和功能，899.99 美元的价格在我们看来是合理的，但当然也不是什么便宜货。
Pros+ 良好的游戏性能
+ 120-Hz 显示屏和 VRR
+ 稳定且高质量的机箱
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 超长运行时间
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 32 GB 内存、2 倍雷电 4 和 Wi-Fi 7
+ 可更换的 M.2-2230 固态硬盘
+ 快速 microSD 读卡器Cons- 复杂的能量曲线
- 风扇转速在负载情况下波动
- 无网络摄像头
- 微星软件有时略显迟缓
价格和供应情况微星 Claw 8 AI+ 的售价为 899.99 美元，可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买。
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.84.7%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,196.94msi Claw PC Gaming Handheld:...2. $9.99TQLGY 2 Pack Tempered Glass ...3. $17.99CDCHGAM Protector Cover Case...List Price: 999€793 g30 mm8.00"1920x1200283 PPIIPS
2.84.6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $479.22List Price: 899€685 g36.9 mm7.00"1920x1080315 PPIIPS
3.78.2%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $649.63Lenovo Legion Go S - 2025 - ...2. $619.99Lenovo Legion Go S 512GB SSD...3. $8.99amFilm 2 Pack Screen Protect...List Price: 700€738 g22.6 mm8.00"1920x1200283 PPIIPS-Grade
4.88.9% v7 (old)Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘ AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $689.90List Price: 679€640 g49 mm7.40"1280x800204 PPIOLED
5.80.2%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘32 GB MemoryAmazon: List Price: 1400 USD777 g22.2 mm8.80"2560x1600343 PPIIPS
6.77.4%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $719.93List Price: 849€672 g33 mm7.00"1920x1080315 PPIIPS
7.84.9% v7 (old)ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘32 GB MemoryAmazon: List Price: 1017 USD876 g43 mm8.40"2560x1600IPS
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents结论 - MSI Claw 8 AI+ 是最好的游戏掌上电脑之一，但也非常昂贵规格外壳和连接软件 - MSI Center M输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS，120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器排放与能源Notebookcheck 总评分
微星的 Claw 8 AI+ 是该厂商的第二代游戏掌机，性能大幅提升，但仍使用英特尔处理器。我们的测试设备是售价 899.99 美元的微星 Claw 8 AI+ AV2M-015 版本，配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 258V(Lunar Lake)、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及刷新率为 120 Hz 和 VRR 的全新 8 英寸 IPS 显示屏。
规格
MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Claw Series)ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar LakeGraphics adapterIntel Arc Graphics 140V, 32.0.101.6449Memory32 GB , LPDDR5x-8533, Dual-Channel, onboardDisplay8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, Capacitive, PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 120 HzStorageKioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, 512 GB , 869 GB freeSoundcardIntel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)Connections2 USB4 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint ReaderNetworkingIntel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 299 x 126Battery80 Wh, 6900 mAh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeAdditional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 24 Months WarrantyWeight793 g, Power Supply: 192 g
Price999 EuroLinksMSI homepageMSI notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接微星对这款掌上电脑的设计进行了重大改动，除了外壳更大之外，手柄也变成了沙色，看起来非常漂亮。这让该设备看起来更有质感，也使其有别于一般只有黑色的竞争对手。这两款手柄再次采用了 LED 光环。尽管 Claw 8 的外壳较大，但手感很好，我们可以长时间使用而没有任何问题。它的稳定性和制造质量都非常好，我们没有注意到吱吱作响的声音。
机箱背面可以轻松拆卸，必要时可以更换 M.2-2230 固态硬盘和电池。现在还有第二个 Thunderbolt 4 端口可用，设备的快速 microSD 读卡器和 Wi-Fi 7 模块依然存在。它是一款 Copilot+ 设备，但没有安装网络摄像头。它的部分包装可以改装成支架。
与 ROG Ally X，你会立即发现其 8 英寸显示屏所带来的不同，当然，这款手持设备的整体尺寸也明显更大。此外，Claw 8 的重量比 ROG Ally X 重约 100 克。
微星 Claw 8 AI+（下）与华硕 ROG Ally X（上）
微星 Claw 8 AI+（左）对比华硕 ROG Ally X（右）
尺寸比较
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED MSI Claw 8 AI+ MSI Claw Lenovo Legion Go S Asus ROG Ally X GPD Pocket 4 DIN A4 ❌
连接：音量按钮、3.5 毫米音频、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery 3.0）、带指纹扫描仪的电源按钮
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s -8%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 201, n=11, last 2 years)
121.1 MB/s -40%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s -40%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
89.2 MB/s -56%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
85.19 MB/s -58%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
55 MB/s -73%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
32.9 MB/s -84%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
260.1 MB/s +19%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s +15%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
218.7 MB/s MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.2 MB/s -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 261, n=11, last 2 years)
179.5 MB/s -18%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
89.85 MB/s -59%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
74.7 MB/s -66%
NetworkingMSI Claw 8 AI+Intel BE201 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1663 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1561 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Go SMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1713 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1890 (min: 1782) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 1672) MBit/s ∼94%
GPD Pocket 4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1281 (min: 1157) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1380 (min: 1142) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1224 (min: 1083) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
942 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus ROG Ally XMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1675 (min: 1467) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1686 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼98%
MSI ClawIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1582 (min: 1462) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1524 (min: 1468) MBit/s ∼89%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Quectel FC66E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
917 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
999 (min: 941) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1762 (min: 1653) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1858 (min: 1771) MBit/s ∼100%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1553 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1532 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1397 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼75%
MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1663 (1554-1715) MSI Claw 8 AI+; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1561 (1517-1595)
可持续性微星没有提供任何有关该设备可持续性、使用可回收材料或环保证书的信息。该产品的包装主要由纸板制成，可以回收利用。
软件 - MSI Center M微星中心 M在小型触摸屏上使用过 Windows 的人都知道，操作起来有多别扭。因此，制造商提供的软件对用户体验就显得尤为重要。就 Claw 8 而言，与上一代产品一样，它使用的软件是 MSI Center M，启动时会自动打开。这里会显示已安装的游戏，并可访问所有设置。此外，还有一个可定制的快速菜单，可用于随时调整重要设置（如亮度、性能模式、性能监控等）。与旧版本一样，该软件总体上运行良好，但其整体功能范围明显小于 ArmoryCrate SE 软件。 华硕 ROG Ally X上的 ArmoryCrate SE 软件相比，其整体功能范围明显较小，而且偶尔会有点卡顿。
输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆良好的触发器和摇杆微星继续为 Claw 8 使用霍尔效应触发器和摇杆，实际效果非常好。特别是触发器的阻力比 Ally X的阻力更大一些，这在玩游戏时感觉更好一些。D-pad 精准且安静，而右侧的常规按键并不显眼。摇杆和触发器的配置选项也可通过微星软件进行设置。当然，手持设备的电容式触摸屏也可用于输入。
显示屏 - 8 英寸 IPS，120 赫兹刷新率和 VRR子像素阵列
轻微背光出血微星将手持设备的屏幕尺寸从 7 英寸（16:9）增至 8 英寸（16:10，1,920 x 1,080 像素）。不过，它的基本功能，包括 120Hz 刷新率和 VRR 支持都没有变化。此外，尽管其黑度和对比度自然无法与 OLED 面板相比，但其画质非常出色。虽然没有使用 PWM 闪烁，但其响应时间略微变慢。
通过使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析，我们测得的平均亮度为 524 cd/m²，对比度超过 1,500:1 。不过，这样的亮度是以过冷的色温为代价的，我们注意到画面偏蓝--总的来说，它的出厂校准不是特别好。我们通过自己的校准大大改善了这一问题（我们的配置文件可在右侧免费下载），但这也使其最大亮度降低了约 50 cd/m²。该显示器完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。
518cd/m²519cd/m²533cd/m²504cd/m²524cd/m²509cd/m²501cd/m²498cd/m²519cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessPN8007QB1-2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 513.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %Center on Battery: 524 cd/m²Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}calibrated: 1.3ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)98.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.22CCT: 7852 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
MSI Claw 8 AI+PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 HzLenovo Legion Go SLEN91C1, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8", 120 HzGPD Pocket 4YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 HzAsus ROG Ally XTL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 HzMSI ClawTL070FVXS02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 HzValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 HzONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 HzDisplay-2%18%-6%-5%25%14% Display P3 Coverage (%)71.169.71 -2%92.7 30%66.2 -7%67 -6%99.6 40%91.9 29% sRGB Coverage (%)98.599.02 1%99.6 1%93.4 -5%94.4 -4%100 2%99.3 1% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)72.970.34 -4%90 23%68.5 -6%69.4 -5%96.1 32%81.6 12%Response Times-36%-17%61%59%51%-31% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)23.7 ?(11, 12.7)30.8 ?(14.6, 16.2) -30%27.9 ?(13.4, 14.5) -18%9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3) 59%9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6) 61%9 ?(4.5, 4.5) 62%25.5 ?(11.5, 25) -8% Response Time Black / White * (ms)14.9 ?(7.8, 7.1)21.2 ?(11.4, 9.8) -42%17.2 ?(8.3, 8.9) -15%5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2) 62%6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5) 56%9 ?(4.5, 4.5) 40%22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67) -53% PWM Frequency (Hz)360 ?(100)Screen-42%-9%-1%4%143%-4%Brightness middle (cd/m²)524538.8 3%511.2 -2%484 -8%477 -9%485 -7%318 -39%Brightness (cd/m²)514509 -1%524 2%456 -11%461 -10%482 -6%287 -44%Brightness Distribution (%)9393 0%84 -10%88 -5%88 -5%98 5%48 -48%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.330.46 -39%0.4 -21%0.35 -6%0.32 3%0.03 91%0.1118 66%Contrast (:1)15881171 -26%1278 -20%1383 -13%1491 -6%16167 918%2844 79%Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.57.2 -106%4.54 -30%2.9 17%2.6 26%2 43%4.81 -37%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *7.312.5 -71%8.96 -23%7.1 3%5.8 21%5 32%6.93 5%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.32.3 -77%0.95 27%1.4 -8%1.5 -15%1.53 -18%Greyscale dE 2000 *5.99.5 -61%6.4 -8%4.5 24%3.9 34%2 66%6.12 -4%Gamma2.22 99%2.44 90%2.26 97%2.24 98%2.17 101%2 110%2.003 110%CCT7852 83%9485 69%8125 80%7534 86%7250 90%6336 103%7707 84%Total Average (Program / Settings)-27% /
-33%-3% /
-5%18% /
7%19% /
10%73% /
101%-7% /
-4%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White14.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.8 ms rise↘ 7.1 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise↘ 12.7 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8091 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
在烈日下，由于触摸屏反光，这款手持设备显得有些吃力，但这并不奇怪。其视角稳定性也没有问题。
视角稳定性性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器
测试条件Claw 8 具有三种不同的能量曲线（续航、AI 引擎、手动），默认情况下选择的是AI 引擎。根据使用情况，设备会自动选择最佳的功率参数，但在我们的测试中，它只是保持在 17 瓦。要想获得尽可能高的游戏性能，你必须使用手动模式，然后可以在 8、17 和 30 瓦的 TDP 限制之间进行选择（但只能在 M Center 应用程序中进行选择，而不是快速菜单）。我们在手动模式和 30 瓦功率下进行了以下基准测试和测量。
能源概况
调节风扇曲线处理器 - Core Ultra 7 258V酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 酷睿至尊 7 258V来自英特尔的 Lunar Lake 系列，拥有 8 个核心，在微星魔爪中的最大功耗为 37/30 瓦。由于核心数量较少，Lunar Lake 芯片的多核性能要弱于老式的 Meteor Lake 芯片和 AMD CPU，但其单核性能比以前更好。即使把 Claw 8 AI+ 当作一台普通电脑使用，其性能也完全可以胜任大多数日常任务。在持续负载的情况下，性能损失微乎其微，我们也没有注意到电池工作性能进一步下降。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1491 (1472.1-1573.87) Lenovo Legion Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go: Ø852 (844.29-855.16) GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38) Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18) MSI Claw Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1922 (1902.14-1950.08) ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
91.2 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.8 pt MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.9 pt ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
72.8 pt MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
72.6 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
71.4 pt Average of class Handheld / UMPC
69.5 pt Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -6! AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
39.7 pt Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
34.7 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
16546 (14363.5min - 16546.4max) Points +56%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
15120 Points +43%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
14463 Points +36%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points +25%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4953 - 16841, n=15, last 2 years)
12058 Points +14%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10599 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7920 - 11097, n=23)
10184 Points -4%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
5778 Points -45%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3984 Points -62%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2006 Points +10%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1957, n=23)
1860 Points +2%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1825 Points MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1770 Points -3%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points -5%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points -5%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1071 - 2006, n=15, last 2 years)
1682 Points -8%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1281 Points -30%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6449 Points +58%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5794 Points +42%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points +26%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points +17%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1904 - 6577, n=13, last 2 years)
4625 Points +13%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4092 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3130 - 4314, n=23)
3953 Points -3%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2051 Points -50%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1521 Points -63%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
787 Points +11%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=23)
712 Points 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
711 Points MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points -4%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points -5%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -5%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (390 - 787, n=13, last 2 years)
646 Points -9%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
390 Points -45%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
357 Points -50%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2499 (2245.42min - 2499.38max) Points +59%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points +48%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points +33%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points +24%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (855 - 2533, n=13, last 2 years)
1862 Points +18%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1574 (1472.1min - 1573.87max) Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1280 - 1656, n=23)
1569 Points 0%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
855 (844.29min - 855.16max) Points -46%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
689 Points -56%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Points +7%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
285 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=23)
284 Points 0%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points -7%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
262 Points -8%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -10%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=13, last 2 years)
242 Points -15%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
155.1 Points -46%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
588 Seconds * -76%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 452, n=23)
357 Seconds * -7%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
334 Seconds * Average of class Handheld / UMPC (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years)
311 Seconds * +7%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds * +26%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds * +28%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
214 Seconds * +36%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
192 Seconds * +43%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
66618 MIPS +87%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
64454 MIPS +81%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS +58%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS +50%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (23417 - 66618, n=12, last 2 years)
48889 MIPS +37%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
35705 MIPS Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (28482 - 36724, n=23)
34795 MIPS -3%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
23583 MIPS -34%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
19684 MIPS -45%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6143 MIPS +8%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6077 MIPS +7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5265 - 5869, n=23)
5694 MIPS +1%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
5662 MIPS MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS -6%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3675 - 6143, n=13, last 2 years)
5292 MIPS -7%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3675 MIPS -35%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
3653 MIPS -35%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13426 Points +23%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12026 Points +10%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10899 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8964 - 11334, n=23)
10796 Points -1%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
10464 Points -4%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3950 - 13426, n=14, last 2 years)
9821 Points -10%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points -32%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
4966 Points -54%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4587 Points -58%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2904 Points +7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2593 - 2795, n=23)
2739 Points +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2716 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2550 Points -6%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2433 Points -10%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1333 - 2904, n=14, last 2 years)
2259 Points -17%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points -17%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
1400 Points -48%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1348 Points -50%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11975 Points +27%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10713 Points +13%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points +7%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9439 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7574 - 9918, n=23)
9431 Points 0%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 11975, n=14, last 2 years)
8872 Points -6%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points -18%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
4457 Points -53%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
3932 Points -58%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2134 Points +8%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1891 - 2046, n=23)
1997 Points +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1969 Points Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1917 Points -3%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points -10%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=14, last 2 years)
1655 Points -16%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points -18%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
1486 Points -25%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
875 Points -56%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
20.3 fps +55%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.7 fps +43%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps +21%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps +12%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.21 - 20.8, n=13, last 2 years)
14.6 fps +11%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
13.1 fps Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9.65 - 14.2, n=23)
12.4 fps -5%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
7.07 fps -46%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
92.8 s * -126%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.1 - 92.8, n=13, last 2 years)
59.3 s * -44%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s * -41%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
51.4 s * -25%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
49.7 s * -21%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=23)
48.5 s * -18%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s * -12%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
41.1 s * R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go
0.756 sec * -68%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=13, last 2 years)
0.523 sec * -16%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec * -7%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec * -4%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4601 sec * -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.443 - 0.4998, n=23)
0.4591 sec * -2%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
0.4492 sec * GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.4167 sec * +7%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1574 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit167.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit285 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)711 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)4092 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core10599 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1825 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core120 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core590 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89.4 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.4 pt ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.3 pt Average of class Handheld / UMPC
65.8 pt MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
57.1 pt MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
53 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
50.6 pt Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
32.6 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
25805 KRay/s +111%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24519 KRay/s +101%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s +78%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6544 - 26450, n=13, last 2 years)
16724 KRay/s +37%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
12224 KRay/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8454 - 12781, n=23)
11482 KRay/s -6%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10795 KRay/s -12%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
6990 KRay/s -43%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
103637 Points +69%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
95655 Points +56%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points +50%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (36464 - 103637, n=13, last 2 years)
71212 Points +16%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
61266 Points MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
58068 Points -5%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (40875 - 63401, n=23)
57139 Points -7%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
42932 Points -30%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
4475 MB/s +66%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4465 MB/s +66%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s +56%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1157 - 4484, n=13, last 2 years)
3158 MB/s +17%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2707 MB/s 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
2696 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1930 - 2817, n=23)
2570 MB/s -5%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
1403 MB/s -48%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
107867 Points +117%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points +100%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
80927 Points +63%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41744 - 107867, n=13, last 2 years)
70873 Points +42%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69419 Points +40%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
49750 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48816 - 49818, n=23)
49647 Points 0%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45741 Points -8%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
16640 Points +276%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14281 Points +223%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points +208%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4425 - 16980, n=13, last 2 years)
10526 Points +138%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8463 Points +91%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
5002 Points +13%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
4425 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3817 - 4440, n=23)
4343 Points -2%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55457 Points +70%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
50357 Points +55%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points +49%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19153 - 55457, n=13, last 2 years)
37470 Points +15%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
32540 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (21670 - 33565, n=23)
30037 Points -8%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
28245 Points -13%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
23738 Points -27%AIDA64 / CPU AES
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s +288%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
80158 MB/s +108%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
69125 MB/s +80%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18552 - 119040, n=12, last 2 years)
65624 MB/s +71%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
59882 MB/s +56%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (30957 - 40753, n=23)
38505 MB/s 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
38453 MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
21547 MB/s -44%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
1077 MB/s +75%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s +60%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s +46%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
796 MB/s +29%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1112, n=13, last 2 years)
766 MB/s +24%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
616 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (422 - 632, n=23)
584 MB/s -5%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
356 MB/s -42%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
13665 KRay/s +103%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
13049 KRay/s +94%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s +68%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3585 - 14181, n=13, last 2 years)
8882 KRay/s +32%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
6728 KRay/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4258 - 6930, n=23)
6104 KRay/s -9%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
5732 KRay/s -15%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
3766 KRay/s -44%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
54726 MPixel/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44223 - 55458, n=23)
53323 MPixel/s -3%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
49287 MPixel/s -10%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
49112 MPixel/s -10%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 54726, n=13, last 2 years)
42188 MPixel/s -23%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
39932 MPixel/s -27%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s -51%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
19472 MPixel/s -64%
系统性能由于采用了现代化的组件，Claw 8 AI+ 的响应速度非常快，我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
7471 Points +2%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
7314 Points Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7149 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=22)
6929 Points -5%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
6504 Points -11%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3592 - 8082, n=13, last 2 years)
6504 Points -11%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points -19%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5219 Points -29%PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
11262 Points +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
11110 Points Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10633 Points -4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=22)
10370 Points -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7542 - 11262, n=13, last 2 years)
9964 Points -10%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9610 Points -14%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points -17%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
8427 Points -24%PCMark 10 / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10031 Points +5%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9912 Points +4%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
9535 Points Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5015 - 14802, n=13, last 2 years)
9037 Points -5%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=22)
8913 Points -7%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
8346 Points -12%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points -23%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
7213 Points -24%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
10026 Points GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
10017 Points 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8914 - 10308, n=22)
9783 Points -2%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9408 Points -6%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
9311 Points -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3326 - 10026, n=13, last 2 years)
8411 Points -16%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points -18%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6350 Points -37%CrossMark / Overall
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1847 Points +7%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1731 Points MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1693 Points -2%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1693 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1551 - 1742, n=21)
1682 Points -3%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (865 - 1847, n=12, last 2 years)
1524 Points -12%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points -23%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
865 Points -50%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
840 Points -51%CrossMark / Productivity
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1719 Points +3%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1672 Points MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1649 Points -1%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1639 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1479 - 1684, n=21)
1624 Points -3%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (878 - 1719, n=12, last 2 years)
1475 Points -12%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points -15%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
878 Points -47%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
874 Points -48%CrossMark / Creativity
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2077 Points +8%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1919 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=21)
1899 Points -1%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1868 Points -3%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1795 Points -6%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (891 - 2077, n=12, last 2 years)
1661 Points -13%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points -33%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
891 Points -54%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
808 Points -58%CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1610 Points +14%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1538 Points +9%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1411 Points Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1392 Points -1%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1610, n=12, last 2 years)
1305 Points -8%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1246 - 1411, n=21)
1299 Points -8%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
831 Points -41%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
759 Points -46%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
323 Points +3%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
314 Points Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
304 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 317, n=21)
286 Points -9%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
276 Points -12%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (170.3 - 325, n=14, last 2 years)
274 Points -13%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points -27%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
225.6 Points -28%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
291 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=21)
270 Points -7%GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
266 Points -9%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
255 Points -12%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
248 Points -15%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (134.4 - 291, n=13, last 2 years)
225 Points -23%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
186.4 Points -36%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
107 Points -63%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
895 ms * -87%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 931, n=13, last 2 years)
611 ms * -28%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
536 ms * -12%MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
529 ms * -10%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms * -8%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=23)
484 ms * -1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
479 ms * GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
428 ms * +11%* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
7314 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (104408 - 114336, n=23)
108324 MB/s 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
107929 MB/s GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
89385 MB/s -17%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
81717 MB/s -24%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (33517 - 107929, n=13, last 2 years)
76744 MB/s -29%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
74414 MB/s -31%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
45050 MB/s -58%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s -59%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
32617 MB/s -70%AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
100208 MB/s +14%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
87827 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=23)
87199 MB/s -1%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80481 MB/s -8%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25476 - 101256, n=13, last 2 years)
70755 MB/s -19%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
58713 MB/s -33%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
38572 MB/s -56%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s -57%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25380 MB/s -71%AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
117883 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108842 - 117989, n=23)
116920 MB/s -1%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106998 MB/s -9%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
98820 MB/s -16%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25595 - 117883, n=13, last 2 years)
87422 MB/s -26%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75350 MB/s -36%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s -58%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
48811 MB/s -59%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
25596 MB/s -78%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
139.6 ns * -40%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns * -33%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, Radeon 680M
129.3 ns * -30%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
122.1 ns * -22%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.8 - 147.6, n=13, last 2 years)
120 ns * -20%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
112.6 ns * -13%GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M
105.5 ns * -6%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
99.8 ns * Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=23)
97.7 ns * +2%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟在延迟测试中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。有一个驱动程序确实有点故障，但重要的中断到进程延迟值非常低。
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2293.5 μs * -370%Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1486.6 μs * -205%Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1435.6 μs * -194%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs * -104%MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
487.7 μs * GPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
471.3 μs * +3%* ... smaller is better
存储设备M.2-2230 固态硬盘微星安装了一块来自 Kioxia 的紧凑型 1TB M.2-2230 SSD（首次启动后可用容量为 869 GB），可以顺利更换。在我们的测试中，PCIe 4.0 SSD 的传输速率非常好，而且完全保持稳定。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdKioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
5147 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5085 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
854 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
578 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
60.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
155.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
1638 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2284 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdKioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02Sequential Read:
4909MB/s
Sequential Write:
4479MB/s
4K Read:
46.1MB/s
4K Write:
135.5MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1715MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1392MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.025ms
Access Time Write:
0.084ms
Copy ISO:
3370.05MB/s
Copy Program:
726.07MB/s
Copy Game:
2073.99MB/s
Score Read:
2252Points
Score Write:
1976Points
Score Total:
5356Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdKioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
5739MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
5252MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3141MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
4301MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
2811MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
1714MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
51.9MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
174.9MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
5845MB/s
Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -11!
90.7 pt GPD Pocket 4
80.5 pt MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
71.6 pt Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
64.2 pt Average of class Handheld / UMPC
62.8 pt Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
61.8 pt Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.3 pt MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
60.4 pt Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -11! Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
44.4 pt DiskSpd
seq readValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
5565 (3733.98min - 5564.79max) MB/s +77%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s +41%GPD Pocket 4
3543 (3463.87min - 3542.51max) MB/s +13%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
3141 (3077.71min - 3140.5max) MB/s MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s -8%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1695 - 3848, n=13, last 2 years)
2807 MB/s -11%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2693 (2674.18min - 2692.74max) MB/s -14%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (2288 - 3141, n=4)
2607 MB/s -17%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2569 (2495.19min - 2569.22max) MB/s -18% seq writeONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s +19%GPD Pocket 4
4625 (3480.81min - 4624.62max) MB/s +8%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4301 (4221.3min - 4301.05max) MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
3185 (1268.34min - 3185.29max) MB/s -26%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (886 - 4625, n=13, last 2 years)
3169 MB/s -26%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1985 - 4301, n=4)
3126 MB/s -27%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2768 (2498.37min - 2767.74max) MB/s -36%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s -36%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1056 (164.42min - 1056.34max) MB/s -75% seq q8 t1 readONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s +22%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
6440 (5527.73min - 6439.51max) MB/s +12%GPD Pocket 4
6355 (5605.9min - 6355.08max) MB/s +11%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5739 (4997.3min - 5739.33max) MB/s Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4952 (4163.75min - 4951.75max) MB/s -14%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2458 - 6996, n=13, last 2 years)
4827 MB/s -16%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (3368 - 5913, n=4)
4774 MB/s -17%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
3760 (2910.85min - 3760.19max) MB/s -34%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s -57% seq q8 t1 writeONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s +17%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5252 (5232min - 5251.88max) MB/s Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4639 - 5370, n=4)
5005 MB/s -5%GPD Pocket 4
4867 (4538.6min - 4867.19max) MB/s -7%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4568 (1284.66min - 4568.32max) MB/s -13%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2720 - 5984, n=13, last 2 years)
3975 MB/s -24%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3033 (2657.93min - 3033.11max) MB/s -42%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s -45%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
1088 (990.07min - 1088.21max) MB/s -79% 4k q1 t1 readValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
97.4 (60.76min - 97.44max) MB/s +88%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s +31%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s +24%GPD Pocket 4
59 (58.74min - 58.95max) MB/s +14%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (39.7 - 71.4, n=13, last 2 years)
56 MB/s +8%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
51.9 (48.63min - 51.87max) MB/s Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 (50.22min - 51.53max) MB/s -1%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (41.7 - 54.8, n=4)
50 MB/s -4%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
46.1 (44.66min - 46.06max) MB/s -11% 4k q1 t1 writeGPD Pocket 4
227 (220.18min - 227.04max) MB/s +30%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s +29%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s +4%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
174.9 (155.08min - 174.93max) MB/s Average of class Handheld / UMPC (96.3 - 262, n=13, last 2 years)
172 MB/s -2%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (119.3 - 174.9, n=4)
149.9 MB/s -14%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
140.9 (139.71min - 140.94max) MB/s -19%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
112.3 (81.5min - 112.29max) MB/s -36%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
112 (100.07min - 111.98max) MB/s -36% 4k q32 t16 readONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s +43%GPD Pocket 4
3497 (1357.47min - 3497.01max) MB/s +24%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2811 (2783.79min - 2810.81max) MB/s MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s -24%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1893 (1813.54min - 1893.35max) MB/s -33%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (464 - 3564, n=13, last 2 years)
1798 MB/s -36%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (919 - 2811, n=4)
1593 MB/s -43%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1106 (1031.05min - 1105.71max) MB/s -61%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
407 (296.91min - 406.67max) MB/s -86% 4k q32 t16 writeONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s +43%GPD Pocket 4
1720 (1666.75min - 1720.14max) MB/s 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1714 (1195.48min - 1713.63max) MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1222 (1181.65min - 1222.42max) MB/s -29%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (232 - 3088, n=13, last 2 years)
1090 MB/s -36%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (474 - 1714, n=4)
985 MB/s -43%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s -68%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
447 (437.78min - 446.91max) MB/s -74%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Phison ESMP001TKB5C3
89.1 (82.16min - 89.09max) MB/s -95%AS SSD
Score TotalGPD Pocket 4
6318 Points +18%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
5356 Points Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4199 - 5371, n=4)
5057 Points -6%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
4941 Points -8%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2035 - 6820, n=11, last 2 years)
4812 Points -10%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4711 Points -12%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points -16% Score ReadGPD Pocket 4
2849 Points +27%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
2252 Points Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2231 Points -1%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points -3%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (702 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)
1897 Points -16%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1512 - 2252, n=4)
1759 Points -22%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1315 Points -42% Score WriteAsus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2787 Points +41%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1613 - 3160, n=4)
2459 Points +24%GPD Pocket 4
2054 Points +4%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1976 Points Average of class Handheld / UMPC (745 - 3248, n=11, last 2 years)
1897 Points -4%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1704 Points -14%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points -38% Seq ReadGPD Pocket 4
5293.31 MB/s +8%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
5107.56 MB/s +4%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4909 MB/s Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (4666 - 4909, n=4)
4824 MB/s -2%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)
3795 MB/s -23%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3524 MB/s -28%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s -47% Seq WriteGPD Pocket 4
4532.38 MB/s +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
4479 MB/s Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (3184 - 4479, n=4)
3545 MB/s -21%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)
2879 MB/s -36%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
2264.42 MB/s -49%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2084 MB/s -53%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s -69% 4K ReadLenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
66.86 MB/s +45%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s +40%GPD Pocket 4
58.86 MB/s +28%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (36.4 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)
57.3 MB/s +24%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.5 MB/s +3%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (42.5 - 50.7, n=4)
47.1 MB/s +2%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
46.1 MB/s 4K WriteGPD Pocket 4
200.12 MB/s +48%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s +48%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.9 MB/s +24%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (117.1 - 202, n=4)
161.8 MB/s +19%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (89.1 - 221, n=11, last 2 years)
159.1 MB/s +17%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
135.5 MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
106.87 MB/s -21% 4K-64 ReadGPD Pocket 4
2260.35 MB/s +32%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s +9%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1715 MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1653.06 MB/s -4%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (430 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)
1428 MB/s -17%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (973 - 1715, n=4)
1230 MB/s -28%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
915 MB/s -47% 4K-64 WriteAsus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2411 MB/s +73%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (1178 - 2636, n=4)
1943 MB/s +40%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (250 - 2812, n=11, last 2 years)
1515 MB/s +9%GPD Pocket 4
1400.18 MB/s +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
1392 MB/s Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
1370.24 MB/s -2%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s -36% Access Time ReadLenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.142 ms * -468%GPD Pocket 4
0.082 ms * -228%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.021 - 0.148, n=11, last 2 years)
0.07255 ms * -190%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms * -172%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.03 ms * -20%Average Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (0.024 - 0.04, n=4)
0.029 ms * -16%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.025 ms * Access Time WriteAverage Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 (0.082 - 0.098, n=4)
0.087 ms * -4%MSI Claw 8 AI+Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
0.084 ms * GPD Pocket 4
0.065 ms * +23%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.017 - 0.129, n=11, last 2 years)
0.05345 ms * +36%Lenovo Legion Go SSK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N
0.037 ms * +56%Asus ROG Ally XWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.022 ms * +74%MSI ClawKioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms * +75%* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Claw 8 AI+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5845 (5515.38-5873.91)
图形卡英特尔 英特尔 Arc Graphics 140VClaw 8 的图形性能非常出色，在合成基准测试中名列我们对比组的前茅。不过，游戏性能当然更为重要，Lunar Lake 处理器在这方面的表现也非常出色。在我们的标准测试中，Claw 8 的表现仅次于价格更高的 GDP Pocket，但旧的 爪被超越了 25%，而 ROG Ally X领先约 10%。在我们的测试中，《GTA V》在启动时不断崩溃，因此我们无法在此提供任何结果。除此之外，没有任何问题。无论是在长时间游戏还是在电池供电的情况下，它的游戏性能都完全稳定。
3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance rating - Percent
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
95.9 pt MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
91.9 pt Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
89 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
86.8 pt GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
85.4 pt MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
84.8 pt ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
77.3 pt Lenovo Legion Go S -1! AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
56.1 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13828 Points +22%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13267 Points +17%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points +8%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8133 - 15988, n=12, last 2 years)
12125 Points +7%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points +6%Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7351 - 12772, n=36)
11330 Points 0%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
11316 Points 3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Handheld / UMPC (5444 - 45916, n=16, last 2 years)
10458 Points +5%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
9971 Points Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6209 - 10476, n=36)
9508 Points -5%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points -12%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points -14%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
8540 Points -14%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points -20%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
6580 Points -34%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Handheld / UMPC (1769 - 21569, n=16, last 2 years)
4176 Points +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4118 Points Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (2754 - 4415, n=39)
3934 Points -4%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points -15%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3286 Points -20%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points -22%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points -30%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
2058 Points -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
11827 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
9075 points3DMark Time Spy Score
4448 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score
812 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3289 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
3267 pointsHelp... in comparison
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
980 Seconds * -79%Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (506 - 772, n=35)
591 Seconds * -8%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
546 Seconds * Average of class Handheld / UMPC (290 - 1026, n=13, last 2 years)
512 Seconds * +6%MSI ClawIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds * +20%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
385 Seconds * +29%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
365 Seconds * +33%GPD Pocket 4AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
304 Seconds * +44%Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
327 Seconds * Average of class Handheld / UMPC (n=1last 2 years)
327 Seconds * * ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
98 pt MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
93.2 pt Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
83.9 pt Average of class Handheld / UMPC
82.7 pt MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
74.5 pt ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 -2! AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
73.7 pt Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
59 pt Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4! AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
53.5 pt Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.5 (23.4min) fps GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
26.6 (22.1min) fps -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 91.4, n=21, last 2 years)
24.1 fps -15%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 (19.3min) fps -20%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min) fps -31%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
13.8 (11.7min, 10.2P1) fps -52%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
29.1 fps +1%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.7 fps Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 118.8, n=19, last 2 years)
28.7 fps 0%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 fps -10%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3 fps -29%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
18.1 fps -37%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
34.4 fps GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
32.5 fps -6%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30 fps -13%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps -18%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.9 - 34.8, n=19, last 2 years)
27.7 fps -19%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps -26%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
19.9 fps -42%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
18.4 fps -47%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
56.1 (18min, 29.5P1) fps GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
56.1 (42.7min, 45.4P1) fps 0%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1) fps -8%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps -13%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32.8 - 58.8, n=20, last 2 years)
47.7 fps -15%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps -18%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
35.9 (10min, 11.8P1) fps -36%Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
30 fps -47%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
85 (75.3min) fps +3%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
82.2 (57.3min) fps Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
76.2 (68.4min) fps -7%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=19, last 2 years)
67.3 fps -18%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps -23%ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps -27%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
58.7 (50.9min) fps -29%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
GPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M
50.5 fps +57%MSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps +21%Average of class Handheld / UMPC (22.7 - 50.5, n=19, last 2 years)
34.5 fps +7%Asus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.2 fps +3%MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
32.2 fps ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps -14%Lenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M
26.5 fps -18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø25.3 (23.7-26.2)
lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)
0 game wont start
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
100.7
94
84.1
82.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
87.6
87.6
34.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
43.3
36.5
32.2
Strange Brigade (2018)
227
81.7
67.9
56.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
40.4
33.5
29.2
28.7
Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)
46.8
37.4
31.4
28.5
F1 24 (2024)
85.7
76.2
59.5
20.1
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)
18
排放与能源噪音排放两个风扇手持设备的两个风扇启动相当快，尤其是在功率最大的模式下，但在游戏过程中，风扇的波动行为更令人担忧。在 30 瓦的手动模式下，该设备的噪音在 37.3-41.4 dB(A) 之间变化，尽管其 TDP 绝对不变。我们在AI模式（37/17 瓦）下也观察到了这种情况，但噪音范围在 33.4-37.3 dB(A)之间。测试期间，测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise level
Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 28.9 dB(A)Load
37.3 / 41.4 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
MSI Claw 8 AI+Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02Lenovo Legion Go SRadeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182NGPD Pocket 4Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Asus ROG Ally XRadeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00MSI ClawArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Radeon 780M, R7 7840UNoise-5%-7%-3%-9%5%1%off / environment * (dB)24.725.6 -4%22.8 8%24.7 -0%25.7 -4%24.7 -0%24.4 1%Idle Minimum * (dB)24.725.6 -4%25.8 -4%24.7 -0%25.7 -4%25 -1%24.4 1%Idle Average * (dB)24.725.6 -4%25.8 -4%24.7 -0%31.7 -28%25 -1%24.4 1%Idle Maximum * (dB)28.928.37 2%31 -7%28.5 1%31.7 -10%25 13%30.6 -6%Load Average * (dB)37.347 -26%42.6 -14%36.6 2%31.3 16%36 3%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)41.443.1 -4%43.3 -5%42.6 -3%45.5 -10%Load Maximum * (dB)41.448.5 -17%45.1 -9%42.6 -3%45.5 -10%40.8 1%39.3 5%* ... smaller is better
温度其表面温度总体很低，尤其是手持设备的手柄几乎不会发热。热空气从设备顶部排出。在压力测试期间，各 TDP 值保持不变。
CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试（红色：手动/30 瓦，绿色：人工智能引擎）
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
36.6 °C35 °C34.7 °C 35.7 °C34.9 °C34.6 °C 35 °C35.3 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °CAverage: 35 °C
29.5 °C34.8 °C28.4 °C28.7 °C34.5 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C30.4 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °CAverage: 30.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
26.3 °C26.8 °C26.1 °C 26.4 °C26.5 °C26.4 °C 27.5 °C27 °C26.4 °C
Maximum: 27.5 °CAverage: 26.6 °C
27.1 °C27.1 °C27.2 °C25.7 °C26.2 °C26.5 °C24.5 °C25.3 °C24.7 °C
Maximum: 27.2 °CAverage: 26 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
35.8 °C36.3 °C34.7 °C 34.9 °C34.5 °C34.5 °C 34.7 °C35 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 36.3 °CAverage: 34.8 °C
27.8 °C34.3 °C27.6 °C27.2 °C34 °C28.1 °C26.9 °C29.2 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 34.3 °CAverage: 29.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 37.8 °C / 100 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.7 °C / 89.1 F (-3.6 °C / -6.4 F).
表面温度应力测试（正面）
表面温度应力测试（背面）
MSI Claw 8 AI+Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140VLenovo Legion Go SAMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680MGPD Pocket 4AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890MAsus ROG Ally XAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780MMSI ClawIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUHeat-9%1%-8%-14%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)36.640 -9%33.8 8%42.7 -17%41.8 -14%Maximum Bottom * (°C)34.835.5 -2%35.2 -1%39.7 -14%35.9 -3%Idle Upper Side * (°C)27.532.5 -18%26.6 3%28 -2%31.6 -15%Idle Bottom * (°C)27.229.2 -7%28.6 -5%27.2 -0%33.6 -24%* ... smaller is better
发言人该设备的两个立体声扬声器非常出色，与旧款微星爪机相比再次得到了改进。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go S audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)Compared to same class» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 18% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 18% similar, 41% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 64% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 68% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%Compared to all devices tested» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量65 瓦电源尽管 Claw 8 的显示屏更大，但它在空闲时比前一代产品和其他竞争对手更加节俭。我们在压力测试中测得的最大耗电量为 59 瓦，约一分钟后耗电量降至 50 瓦。游戏时，我们测得的功耗约为 46 瓦。因此，随附的 65 瓦插入式电源（重 192 克）大小适中。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.46 / 0.48 WattIdle 3.2 / 6.3 / 6.6 Watt
Load
40.6 / 59.3 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
MSI Claw 8 AI+Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"Lenovo Legion Go SZ2 Go, Radeon 680M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8"GPD Pocket 4Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"Asus ROG Ally XZ1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"MSI ClawUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4"ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"Power Consumption-41%-28%-19%-60%-1%-42%Idle Minimum * (Watt)3.25.3 -66%6 -88%4.3 -34%7.8 -144%4.5 -41%6.66 -108%Idle Average * (Watt)6.39.4 -49%8.8 -40%6.7 -6%11.5 -83%7.21 -14%7.11 -13%Idle Maximum * (Watt)6.615.5 -135%9.2 -39%7.5 -14%11.8 -79%9.66 -46%11.7 -77%Load Average * (Watt)40.653.1 -31%48.2 -19%53.1 -31%22.86 44%46.708 -15%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)4747.6 -1%50.1 -7%61.3 -30%54.4 -16%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)46.745.4 3%45.7 2%53.9 -15%Load Maximum * (Watt)59.357.8 3%56.4 5%66.8 -13%64.6 -9%27.8 53%56.7 4%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)53.1* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.2 (46.8-59.3) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.04 (4.85-5.48) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø47 (43.3-51.4)
Power consumption with external monitor
MSI Claw 8 AI+; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51 (44.8-58) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø53.1 (22.1-55.1) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (20.2-43.7) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55.1 (53.9-55.8) MSI Claw 8 AI+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.2 (36.8-47.4) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.6 (5.39-6.75) MSI Claw 8 AI+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø46.7 (44.1-53.5)
运行时间微星将手持设备的电池容量提高到了 80 Wh，再加上其较低的消耗值，因此运行时间非常出色。游戏时，这在很大程度上取决于所选的能耗模式：在我们的测试中，在最快模式下，《赛博朋克》运行了 01:45 小时（约 25fps），而在人工智能引擎模式下，仅运行了不到 3.5 小时（约 19fps）。
在 150 cd/m²（测试设备最大亮度的 29%）条件下进行的普通 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间接近 24 小时，即使在全亮度条件下，运行时间也超过了 16.5 小时（均为 60 Hz），这都是非常长的运行时间。
电池信息
充电过程
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
1h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
23h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
16h 37min
MSI Claw 8 AI+Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 WhLenovo Legion Go SZ2 Go, Radeon 680M, 55.5 WhGPD Pocket 4Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 45 WhAsus ROG Ally XZ1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 WhMSI ClawUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 WhValve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 WhONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 WhAverage of class Handheld / UMPC Battery runtime-35%-74%-8%-48%-61%-54%-51%WiFi v1.3 (h)23.68.6 -64%6.2 -74%15.8 -33%7.8 -67%9.3 -61%10.8 -54%11.5 ?(5.43 - 23.6, n=13, last 2 years) -51%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h)1.81.7 -6%2.1 17%1.3 -28%Gaming (h)4.21.683 ?(n=1last 2 years)Witcher 3 ultra (h)1.2
Notebookcheck 总评分
Back to the verdict
MSI Claw 8 AI+
- 03/06/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis87 / 98 → 89%
Mechanical Inputs71%
Pointing Device100%
Connectivity69 / 68 → 100%
Weight78 / 69-83 → 67%
Battery93%
Display81%
Games Performance57 / 75 → 75%
Application Performance84 / 92 → 92%
Temperature92%
Noise83%
Audio89 / 91 → 97%
Average64%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use84.4%Repairability40%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 32.8%
More articles related to this deviceMSI Claw 8 AI+ (Claw Series)News•微星Claw A8的新AMD版本比英特尔版本差，尽管价格相同 |Review•8 英寸游戏掌上电脑也配备 AMD - MSI Claw A8 评测 |News•微星 Claw 8 AI+ 与罗杰 Ally X：据报道，Lunar Lake APU 让微星在性能和电池续航时间方面缩小差距 |Review•微星Claw评测--搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra处理器的游戏掌上电脑令人失望
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 683787 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!